 |

|
According
to a recent Press Democrat article,
80 percent of people now in treatment
are referred by the court and more than
half of all court referrals are methamphetamine
addicts. This was given in a report
in July, 2006 to the Sonoma County Board
of Supervisors.
The
report said that local methamphetamine
use "significantly increased"
in the 1990's "but has changed
little since then," and alcohol
still accounts for the most admissions.
However, by fiscal year 2004 through
2005, the last for which full data is
available, admissions for methamphetamine
exceeded the number of county wide admissions
for all illicit drugs combined.
Proposition
36, The Substance Abuse Crime Prevention
Act, was adopted by initiative as Proposition
36 at the November 7, 2000, General
Election operative July 1, 2001, which
has been impetus for treatment. This
law had been opposed by politicians,
law enforcement, and many treatment
professionals. Despite the opposition,
it passed. The law requires treatment
instead of jail being offered to first
and second-time nonviolent drug use
offenders. It allows Judges to send
defendants to jail only after their
third violation; sometimes there are
exceptions as well. Since it took effect
more than 3,000 people have been referred
to treatment in Sonoma County.
Sonoma
County Superior Court Judge Robert Boyd
presides over most of the County’s
drug related cases in Courtroom 15 on
the first floor of the courthouse, next
to the jail. Judge Boyd is quoted as
saying that he has sent hundreds of
the accused into treatment rather than
jail, and he is squarely in the camp
of those who once doubted its use but
now believe it is the key to cutting
drug abuse and related crime. Judge
Boyd is also quoted as saying in the
Press Democrat article dated August
20, 2006,
"We
are getting people off meth...off for
appreciable periods of time and staying
off." Judge Boyd also said, "I
think we simply need to have better
and more treatment available for everybody
who needs it." |